Jim Watkins
9:07PM | September 21, 2009 | comments: 7

Obama and Paterson: The President Shows His Teeth

What a fascinating political sideshow it’s been the past few days, this dust up involving the White House and New York Governor David Paterson. President Obama reportedly sent word to Paterson, via an aide, that he shouldn’t run for election to a full term in 2010, because… well, because nobody likes him, respects him, or thinks he’s doing a remotely acceptable job. Okay, “nobody” is a strong word; but polls show Paterson has a roughly 20% approval rating, which is political terms is equal to.. nothing.

That fact right there is all that matters in this debate. That, and the new side of the President that this whole thing is presenting to America; not Obama the Orator, not Barack the Bridge Builder, but Barack Obama the ruthless political operator.

First, let’s look at how Paterson’s extreme unpopularity shoots down almost every analysis of what this White House intrusion means politically in New York and Washington. Let’s take the arguments I heard and read today:

• Obama had to take Paterson out, because otherwise, the accidental governor might really get his party’s nomination (which he insists he’s still going to pursue), and THAT might lead Rudy Giuliani to make his triumphant return to electoral politics with a run for the governor’s mansion-- because everybody knows Giuliani would drill Paterson in a general election—and THAT could lead to another Giuliani run for the White House in 2012 against….. BARACK OBAMA! So the president, according to this analysis, is protecting his flank from tough competition that could be facing him down the road.

My response?

First, Rudy Giuliani is not going to run for governor. You heard it here first. If I’m wrong, I’ll buy you a drink. But I’m not going to be wrong.

Secondly, David Paterson has no chance in hell of being the democratic nominee for governor in 2010. That ship hasn’t just sailed; it’s sunk. There’s not a serious Democrat in the state who doesn’t know that tonight. So why would the President bother smacking down a governor who won’t get his party’s nomination in a scenario that would allow him to run against a well-known Republican who won’t be running?

• President Obama is going to lose support among his most loyal voting block—African-Americans—by doing this to one of only two black governors in America.

My response? This one line from the results of a new Siena College poll:

“The poll found black voters would prefer someone else to Paterson by a 52%-25% margin.”

• Obama threw Paterson under the bus because he’s worried about the governor dragging down other Democrats running for re-election to Congress or the General Assembly.

Any president should be worried about losing members of his party in midterm elections, and with his health care reform effort not appearing to be destined for greatness, Obama should be also. Besides, as noted above, PATERSON WON’T BE THE NOMINEE! That would be Andrew Cuomo, he of the more than 70% favorability rating.

So, then, why WOULD the President take this unusual step of telling a governor that he needs to sit this one out? THAT’S where we say hi to Obama the Ruthless. David Paterson went against White House wishes on several occasions, most notably the debacle that was the appointment of a new U.S. Senator to replace Hilary Clinton. Obama did not want Kirsten Gillibrand to get the job; Paterson gave it to Kirsten Gillibrand. In doing so, he embarrassed Caroline Kennedy, who along with her Uncle Ted gave Obama the endorsement that turbocharged his run for the White House. Paterson’s inclusion of the President in his rant about how the media is trying to keep black politicians down might have broken the camel’s back.

Take all that into account, and remember that President Obama negotiated quite successfully the cutthroat politics of the South Chicago political machine on his way to becoming a U.S. Senator, and I think we’re finally seeing what makes him mad. If you’re going to butt heads with a (still) popular president, you’d better be pretty solid on your own turf. I think Obama got fed up with being dissed by someone who’s barely above water in his own political life. So the ax came down.

I don’t believe Obama’s going to be losing any sleep over this. There’s not much downside to whacking a politician with so few supporters. The upside is, it gives him a whole new image: Barry the Shiv. Maybe he’ll get tougher on those health care opponents now and do what a lot of people have been urging him to do with his congressional majorities: use sheer political power to sweep opponents and nuisances away.

Bookmark and Share


Comments: 7

Posted by Michael chestnut at September 21, 2009 10:39 PM

I think that the president has a right to tell gov. Paterson not to run because president Obama is the real head of the democrat party so it's only right for him to mention to a fellow democrat when things just aren't working out. However I think that he will lose in the election anyway so let the people decide

Posted by Jamesey at September 21, 2009 10:40 PM

nyers will pick their own just fine. Obama should invest his time else where! ie. Government Motors & Govibank. After all, it's our tax dollars he chose to put in there!

Posted by Asia at September 21, 2009 10:48 PM

President Obama is the leader of the nation and the Democratic party. It is not only his right but his responsibility to offer his opinion even when it may not be welcomed. Patterson does not have enough support from the people he represents and that should be what makes his choice. the president is only trying to prevent a situation that may cause fracture within the Democratic party and distract away from the real issues that need to be addressed.

Posted by kc at September 22, 2009 12:28 AM

I have a question right after I heard this news: why would someone in the white house telling a governor in a state what to do (or what not to)? Isn't Obama stepping on an area that he shouldn't? Doesn't the white house, or the whole Fed, has more important jobs to do?
And no, even though Obama is the president, he is NOT the leader of the Dems despite how good his PR skill is. The only reason he concerns about this is, like Jim said, the election in 2012.
I myself don't dislike Paterson too much, at least I dislike Bloomberg more than him. Anyway, it should up to him to decide to run or not, and not by someone in the white house telling him. Not to mention, not everyone in the Dems likes to take order from Obama.
"Rudy Giuliani is not going to run for governor"
Don't be so sure, things in politics can change suddenly.

I pretty much agree with everything Jim said in his blog today (that's a first). Obama seems to feel the need to comment or opine on everything these days from Kanye West to Gov. Paterson but it seems to show a real worker (or schemer) behind the scenes. I'm not saying that blacks shouldn't think for themselves but I'm reminded of a recent incident at work where one black worker ratted out another black co-worker and I got to thinking maybe that indissoluble cultural bond ain't so indissoluble anymore, blacks throwing other blacks under the bus. Now Pateron's recent racial rant, couldn't disagree more but Obama is not above something of this sort at least on occasion. He did say something once before becoming president about some people have a problem with him because he looks different and I'm assuming what he meant. Obama the Ruthless, thanx for calling it as you see it Jim.

Posted by kc at September 22, 2009 6:42 PM

off topic, but super funny
Polk undercover drug investigators play Wii during raid
http://www2.tbo.com/content/2009/sep/21/undercover-drug-investigators-embarrass-polk-sheri/

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N8FFmCpqoEY

Posted by kc at September 22, 2009 6:50 PM

ok, didn't realize you guys got the info already

Post a comment

Please enter the letter "h" in the field below:


Copyright © 2009 Tribune Interactive
By visiting this site, you are agreeing to our Privacy Policy & Terms of Service.