What the GOP Needs: More John Wayne, Less Dick Cheney
Remember when the Republican Party in America was the party of John Wayne? The movie icon was the epitome of the red-blooded conservative American, symbolizing and speaking out for the core GOP principles of responsibility, personal freedom, and courageous and unwavering belief in the American system of government.
I don’t think John Wayne would have much common ground with the national Republican Party of today, particularly on that last count.

Let’s first take up the most recent and obvious example: the continued call by former vice-president Dick Cheney and others for extra-Constitutional enhanced interrogation techniques, the practice formerly known as torture. Just minutes after President Obama’s speech yesterday where he called for dealing with terrorism detainees and the closing of the prison at Guantanamo Bay in accordance with the Constitution and the Bill of Rights, there was Dick Cheney, trying his best to make Americans feel, not courageous and confident about our system’s ability to handle this, but afraid. Very afraid.
Set aside the highly-debatable notion that torture extracted any actionable, accurate information, and instead apply the John Wayne standard. Would Duke Wayne be traveling from one end of the country to the other, fighting to defend America’s right to strip and torture even enemy combatants? I don’t think so. John Wayne died long before 9/11, but I’ll bet his faith in the Constitution to provide the guidelines to deal with matters like these would have survived even that.
Let’s apply the WWJWD? test (what would John Wayne do?) to some other recent situations:
• Republicans AND Democrats in the Senate seem to believe that a few hundred prisoners from Guantanamo Bay couldn’t be transferred to maximum security prisons in the U.S., because the idea of these mean men on American soil is just too scary. WWJWD? John Wayne would realize no one has ever escaped from a super-max prison, and that many terrorists are already imprisoned here (along with countless homegrown serial killers and mass murderers we’ve somehow managed to keep locked up). But mostly, he just wouldn’t have been scared, and he wouldn’t have been trying to convince other people that they should be scared, too.
• House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said the CIA misled her about waterboarding. That may be arguable, to put it mildly. But how did congressional republicans and party mouthpieces respond? That she needed to apologize to the CIA! WWJWD? He would have deplored the recently-developed GOP habit of coming down with the vapors every time someone looks at them cross-eyed or questions their policy positions, and that there are, shall we say, more manly ways of dealing with flak from someone in the opposing party than getting your feelings hurt over and over. And does the CIA even accept apologies? It’s the CIA, for cryin’ out loud!
• Republican leaders have gotten very worked up over otherwise inconsequential actions by President Obama, like shaking the hand of Venezuelan strongman Hugo Chavez, and taking a few minutes to share his bracket choices with other fans for the NCAA basketball tournament. WWJWD? He’d have no respect for an American president who can’t look a minor foreign leader in the eye and acknowledge him man-to-man, but he damn sure would have respected a president for having a sincere interest in sports.
John Wayne wasn’t just a movie icon, he was an emblem of American masculinity. I think if he were around today, he’d tell the GOP’s whiny wing to man-up, to stop being so delicate, to stop trying to scare people, and to share his faith in the American principles he proudly represented, on screen and in real life. As the Republican Party tries to figure out ways to stay relevant, and appeal to more than a quarter of the American people, it might do worse than to hold a John Wayne film festival... at least for its members who want to secede from the Union, or who would express their desires for a U.S. president—of any party—to fail.

Comments: 4
These are reasons I suspect you are a liberal.
For some reason people are just so generous toward the terrorists. I don't have problem with waterboarding if it can keep American safe.
I mean, if God forbids your loved ones are kidnapped and tied up with a bomb somewhere, I bet you would use more than waterboarding, whatever it takes, to the bad guys who knows where your loved ones are to give out the info.
"John Wayne would realize no one has ever escaped from a super-max prison"
What we concern is not those terrorists may be get out from a prison break. What we concern is they may be get out from the court system by some liberal judges who are empathize with them, think that their rights are violated.
Oppose to many people may think, those guys are not caught from jaywalking, those guys are known and confessed terrorists. They are not Americans, and they didn't commit terrorism in US soil, and so they DON'T have constitutional rights, oppose to what the liberal ACLU like to think.
"But mostly, he just wouldn’t have been scared, and he wouldn’t have been trying to convince other people that they should be scared, too."
So would you like to have a bunch of terrorists jailed behind your backyard (consider we just caught 4 of them)?
"who can’t look a minor foreign leader in the eye and acknowledge him man-to-man"
Are you implying Chavez is a "man"? The one who held absolute power in the state, and oppress those who don't agree with the communist gov? So would Obama shake Hitler or Stalin's hand also if they are still alive? No offense, but this point is just plain BS
And it is also unbelievable, consider that the memorial day is the coming Monday, the day to remember those who to fought and died for our freedom, and our president doesn't have problem to be friend with a communist dictator. This is a disgrace of America!
By the way, after the 4 guys were caught, so far Obama STILL haven't said a word about it, like praising FBI and other law enforcement for their effort to keep us safe. No one feel strange about it? Or does this move (or non move) of him implies he doesn't think this incident is important?
After such big incident, a president should come out RIGHT AWAY to have a say about this. This incident indicates that terrorism is not limited to foreign, but also domestic.
Jim, I think you got it right and I also think John Wayne would be diaappointed in the GOP.
I think maybe he would say," Get off your high horse Pilgrins and stop being a wiener."
Let's add World War Two to the list:WWJWD? Stay in Hollywood and play make-believe soldier while people like Jimmy Stewart and the liberal antichrist Howard Zinn showed themselves as true heroes. John Wayne like Dick Cheney after him had other things to do. The right wing truly deserves it's heroes.
And why do people like KC constantly miss the point? No one cares about the "terrorists" (or Mujahideen or Freedom Fighters; depending on when in the last 30 years you're talking about them). It's the way United States law is applied that is at issue.
Don't these people realize that, yes, today they can get some sort of satisfaction that some slimeball will have his fingernails pulled out by a Blackwater type but tomorrow, when mission creep enables a government agency to ignore rights we citizens used to have but unfortunately were eroded away in order to give the mob something to cheer about, the protections that real heroes died to preserve will be gone?