Jim Watkins
sponsored by: 
Search Blog

AddThis Feed Button
8:49PM | May 25, 2009 | comments: 4

Celebrity Magazines On A First Name Basis

I feel like writing something completely inconsequential on this holiday evening (in other words, I can hear many of you thinking, just like every other non-holiday evening), so here are some thoughts on celebrity magazines. By celebrity magazines, I mean “People” and its now-countless spawn crowding the newsstand display just feet away from where I buy my daily glass of iced tea in our building lobby. I don’t know all the other titles—there’s “Us,” right? And something called “In Style,” plus a couple of others. I don’t read any of them, not even in doctors’ offices. We live in such a celebrity-saturated culture, I’ve always felt you don’t have to actually “buy” or “read” these magazines to find out what the stories are; the information just sort of seeps into the air all around you, and enters your brain whether you want it to or not, like electromagnetic radiation, or Coldplay.

us%20weekly%202.jpg

But apparently this system no longer works, because the headlines I see plastered all over these rags now are utterly mystifying to me. I truly don’t know who the stories are about, because the celebrities are only identified USING THEIR FIRST NAMES! The past few weeks, it’s been all Jon and Kate; Jon said this, Kate did that. On another magazine cover, it’s Kate said this, Jon did that. I have just one question: who in the hell are Jon and Kate?? And while we’re at it, I’m not quite sure who Trista and Ryan are, and there’s a young actor named Robert who seems to be on every cover. Robert? I’m not down on the whole first name thing, but you’ve got to give me more to work with than that. “Cher” I’m familiar with. Likewise, “Oprah.” But Robert? That’s my dad’s name. That’s a million people’s name.

Part of the problem is, I don’t watch any reality shows, not even in doctors’ offices, and that’s where a lot of these single-named celebs come from. I actually have done a small amount of looking into the Jon and Kate situation. Apparently they’re the parents of eight children, including sextuplets, and there’s a reality show about their family. What doesn’t make any sense is that the magazine stories, at least from the headlines on the cover, seem to be about Jon and Kate reportedly having affairs. That’s impossible. You just told me they have eight kids.

I’m vaguely aware of a Trista and Ryan who were on a reality show a few years ago, The Bachelor, or The Bachelorette. If this is the same Trista and Ryan, they’ve really stretched out their 15-minutes of fame. Usually these reality show folks show up later in the news only after they’re arrested. Reading the magazine blurbs about T & R, I haven’t seen any reference to law breaking. So hats off to them.

I’m not trying to be willfully stupid. I could find out more about these people with only one name if I wanted to, I suppose. But as Peggy Noonan said on a different topic, it’s nice having a little mystery in life. I’m sure I’ll eventually find out who Robert is. After that, I want to find out how a husband and wife with eight kids are able to have time for affairs. Maybe Jon and Kate will explain it to Oprah.

Bookmark and Share


Comments: 4

Posted by KC at May 25, 2009 10:54 PM

I am about the same as you on this.
Americans are long addicted to the entertainment field. They can't wait for the latest news from those celebrities, or the latest Oprah on TV, or those reality shows.
If you ask me, I would say that people are trying to use the entertainment field (among others stuffs) to replace Christ, America's founding faith, without success.
What's worse is, they take in the wrong value from these medias (like casual sex is cool), and that's the main reason why many young people now a day are so screwed up.

Posted by David Choi at May 26, 2009 4:25 AM

Hi, Jim. I've been watching you and Kaity since I was a kid.

Nice blog. I always knew you were a handsome man, but I didn't know you had brains to go along with the good looks until I read this thing.

Thank you for showing me the intellectual, human side of news anchors. I had the impression that you were all talking mannequins that just read from the prompter every night.

Also, I know Asians age very slowly, but wow, Kaity impresses me.

Love you guys!

Posted by Laurie at May 26, 2009 3:47 PM

Hi Jim,
I agree with you that the tabs seem to be trying to create an intimacy between the readers and the front page fodder - except that the intimacy just doesn't exist! But it is a publicists' dream that you, and everyone else waiting for the dentist, will take a peek at those gossip magazines and begin an intimate journey with the stars of these shows. Let's the ratings rise begin!
Speaking of a publicist's dream, is it just me or does everyone else who DOES watch "Jon&Kate" assume that Jon's "affair" was a perfect publicity stunt, pulled at precisely the right time, to whip "J&K" viewers into a frenzy toward the season finale, and of course the new season premier coming up after that?
If Jon and Kate are just reality show amateurs, they've got some real pros staging their awesomely phony "reality" show.
Yes, even YOU will be on a first-name basis with the reality-stars-shoved-down-your-throat before long. And there will be nothing we can do about it. Except change the channel and watch PIX news instead!
LFJ

Posted by Kylie at June 1, 2009 3:38 PM

Wow! I love this blog! It is soo funny. I only wish I had time to read all of your entries. I would do it every day. I especially love the last line in this story. And about Robert, could it be Robert Pattinson? He's the breakthrough star of the vampire movie Twilight. I'm sure you heard of that title.I guess all the 12-16 year old girls are talking about him these days. I'm 13, but I really don't see the obsessiveness over him. Well, anyway, thanks for the great blog!

Post a comment

Please enter the letter "u" in the field below:


Copyright © 2009 Tribune Interactive
By visiting this site, you are agreeing to our Privacy Policy & Terms of Service.