Term Limits and Change Fatigue
I wrote a blog post three weeks ago when Mayor Bloomberg went public with his plan to overturn New York City’s term limits law, so he can run for a third term. Whatever you think of my opinions on the matter, I firmly stand by my final comments that “this isn’t going to be a slam dunk” for Bloomberg. (Wow, it’s fun quoting yourself!) Opposition has indeed sprung up from a number of places. But as you saw in the news today, a judge denied a legal effort to stop a city council vote on changing the term limits. That vote might take place as soon as Thursday, and since Speaker Christine Quinn supports Bloomberg on this, and since she probably wouldn’t schedule a vote unless the headcount was going her way, it might be a done deal (but with a likely possibility of after-the-fact legal challenges).
The pros and cons of the term limits issue are well known by this time, so let’s look instead at some of the psychological factors coursing through the electorate. Polls have shown New Yorkers favor term limits, which really shouldn’t be a surprise, since voters approved them twice during the 1990’s. But when asked if they want Mike Bloomberg to serve another four years, a majority say yes. Paradoxical, no? Well, yes, but also understandable. More after the jump.
This country, and this largest city in this country, are on the cusp of the most enormous changes we’ve witnessed in quite a few generations. It’s looking more and more like we’re going to elect the first African-American President, something that even many of Barack Obama’s most fervent supporters would have never believed they’d see in their lifetimes. And it’s happening at the same time as an economic collapse the likes of which.. well, the likes of which most people wouldn’t believe they’d see in their lifetimes. No matter how you cut it, that’s a lot of change.
Maybe, for a majority of New Yorkers, it’s enough for now. While we pride ourselves on our resiliency and our ability to reinvent, a change at the top at City Hall at this point might be too much to compute for a lot of people. The best thing Mayor Bloomberg might have going for him in his term limits fight is a kind of “change overload” descending on the city’s collective psyche.
The argument could certainly be made that change overload or not, it’s not a valid reason to make an end run around laws put in place by voters. I would probably make that argument myself. But, tonight, I’m not going to question why a majority of New Yorkers seem willing to let this happen.. I’m only going to say again, it’s understandable.


Comments: 2
Read your blog. actually went back a few and thought you were delightfully funny. who knew? Keep up the good work. as far as bloomy is concerned I think he is a good mayor but he needs to understand term limits are term limits babe. leave it alone and run for governor or something.
The issue here is not so much term limits per se as whether a referendum can be overturned by a City Council vote. There were two referenda on this issue and the result of each was a term limits law. This law can not and should not be overturned by the City Council - only by referendum - and most certainly NOT by persons who have a vested interest, i.e. City Council members and a mayor whose term(s) may be expiring.
As to your comment about New Yorkers letting this happen, I don't think that's exactly why this is happening. Apparently, since the Bush Administration took office in 2000, it has become commonplace for government to ignore the will and wishes of the people, even though our government is supposedly "of the people, by the people and for the people." We, the people, would rather not have the City Council make this decision, but it is only people who have the time and wherewithal to take this issue to court and fight for the will of the people who are going to be able to make any difference here. I, for one, am more than willing to have this issue decided, once and for all, by referendum, although in a two-out-of-three contest, the people have already spoken.
Oddly enough, though Mario Cuomo said the decision about whether a politician should be elected should be made by the voters at the polls, we have actually done that already, twice, by referenda. 'Nuff said, then.